Oleg Verych wrote: >>> [incensed ranting on the topic of web applications] >> Oleg, your response doesn't seem to be in response to the message you >> quoted. > > A reply to off topic message to the development list. Insulting -- yes. Why?
Yes, indeed, why? Why do you feel the need to insult someone who is trying to provide constructive feedback? > > In dry lanuage: > > "post your thoughts in your weblog, come here with patches" > > That's a linux-ish style of reaction i've learned from LKML. I think it's > right here also. Such questions while not pure user's for answer, > are more appropriate to debbugs list. Even lack of this shows small or > nearly no homework before posting. This attitude is becoming more prevalent in the free software world, and it saddens me. "If you can't provide a fix, then we don't want to hear from you". There might be many valid reasons why someone would provide feedback without a patch. For the record, I think we should be happy to receive feedback even if the submitter: - Does not have the skills to provide a solution. - Does not have the time to provide a solution. - Can not be bothered to provide a solution (after all, we can't get involved in *everything*, can we?) > >> Instead, you invent a position about complex web technologies and >> attack that. > > Well, just words, style of the `quoted message', so to speak. > >> Worse, you imply that the person you're replying to holds that position >> because of brainwashing. > > I'm sorry if my humor is not funny. > >> Please either address the points raised by the message you're replying >> to, or don't. > > IMHO that message was a hand waving not deserving reading. Thus i > dissagre, that i didn't addressed its points in my reply. > ____ > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]