-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/23/07 09:36, Matthew Vernon wrote: > > On 23 Oct 2007, at 15:04, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > >> ti, 2007-10-23 kello 12:35 +0100, Matthew Vernon kirjoitti: >>> The Authorized Version of the Bible isn't covered by Copyright in >>> the >>> conventional sense. The Queen's Printer (currently Cambridge >>> University Press) has an exclusive commercial right to print the AV >>> (and the BCP, but that's not relevant here) in England >> >> Would not a restriction on commercial use still be against the DFSG, and >> the package therefore be problematic? > > It's not quite that simple. You can't print and sell Bibles in the UK > (unless you are CUP or OUP). Would a bomb-making text in Debian be > non-free because the UK forbids you to print and sell it?
Importantly (maybe?), the right is to *print* the AV. Is there a mention, or assumption, that downloading as electronic file is the same as printing it? - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHHk60S9HxQb37XmcRAjy5AKCDm1TSPXvrzRVNXIgTuMMcw3QOOACffnYG GxC4x7TCKTABf6BCxX0c40U= =83UA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]