On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 11:42:07PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 17:04 +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > ti, 2007-10-23 kello 12:35 +0100, Matthew Vernon kirjoitti: > > > The Authorized Version of the Bible isn't covered by Copyright in > > > the > > > conventional sense. The Queen's Printer (currently Cambridge > > > University Press) has an exclusive commercial right to print the AV > > > (and the BCP, but that's not relevant here) in England > > > > Would not a restriction on commercial use still be against the DFSG, and > > the package therefore be problematic? > > Not to mention the dire sanctions against derivative works of the > Revelation (from chapter 22): > > 18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of > this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the > plagues that are written in this book: > 19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this > prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the > holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
Damn, I was just about to submit a bunch of bugfixes for the some of the more blatantly obviously fuckups, such as the homophobia and misogynism. Regards: David -- /) David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /) Rime on my window (\ // ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ // Diamond-white roses of fire // \) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Beautiful hoar-frost (/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]