Don Armstrong wrote: > [There is some argument that I should completely ignore hurd-i386 by > default since it isn't keeping up *at all* but I haven't made that > change yet.]
Please do. It's been anoying for a long time and there is absolutely no improvement. For example, please take a look at: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=partman-lvm;dist=unstable hurd 11 uploads behind; 7 out of 20 bugs long solved http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=base-installer;dist=unstable hurd 31 uploads behind, 7 out of 33 bugs long solved This issue keeps confusing me and I keep wasting time wondering why bugs are still being shown because I _know_ all architectures are up-to-date. (Except hurd of course, but for all intends and purposes hurd just isn't relevant for me, so I tend to mentally ignore it. And that's unlikely to change until it starts keeping up.) I think I have requested this before. Can we now just do it, pretty please? Thanks, FJP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]