Michael Banck wrote: > On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:06:58PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > Michael Banck wrote: > > > D'oh, that's a known bug in dak which does not generate Packages.gz > > > for d-i/hurd-i386 [1]; I've been told it's low priority. I suggest > > > you prod the ftp-masters to get this fixed. > > > > I suggest that is the porter's job. > > I reported it, yes.
I'll interpret that as "I've reported it again today". Thanks. And maybe the ftp-masters will also just pick up on this thread. I hope they'll agree that having completely wrong info on BTS pages is enough reason to fix this. It really is a very annoying inconvenience for the D-I team that old bugs don't disappear like they should. > > > base-installer is uptodate on hurd-i386, > > > > That's not what the buildd pages tell me [1]: > > hurd-i386 1.86 Needs-Build (1122) 23d 10:34 unknown:out-of-date > > debian-installer no log > > > > Or is this another example of incomplete support of hurd-i386? > > Yes, the wanna-build admins decided to drop hurd-i386 from > buildd.debian.org a couple of years ago. Use > http://buildd.debian-ports.org/ for that. Hmmm. Let's CC Jeroen on this. The stale info there is the main reason why I concluded that the BTS problem was due to hurd-i386 not keeping up. My apologies for drawing the wrong conclusion. Jeroen: Apparently the info for hurd-i386 is completely stale as that arch was removed from wanna-build. This results in incorrect info like [1]. Could you perhaps filter out hurd-i386 so at least others are not confused like I was? Or maybe you know a better solution. Cheers, FJP [1] http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=base-installer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]