Michael Banck wrote: > > And note that that is not because we upload new versions every day. > > partman-lvm: last version built for hurd: 45; uploaded: 2006-07-19 (1.5 > > years!) base-installer: last version built for hurd: 1.57; uploaded: > > 2006-05-14 > > D'oh, that's a known bug in dak which does not generate Packages.gz for > d-i/hurd-i386 [1]; I've been told it's low priority. I suggest you prod > the ftp-masters to get this fixed.
I suggest that is the porter's job. I'd say it's the porters who are responsible for getting a new arch properly supported. At least you now have a good argument why it should _not_ be low priority. > base-installer is uptodate on hurd-i386, That's not what the buildd pages tell me [1]: hurd-i386 1.86 Needs-Build (1122) 23d 10:34 unknown:out-of-date debian-installer no log Or is this another example of incomplete support of hurd-i386? > partman-lvm is Arch: all AFAICT? Yes. [1] http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=base-installer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
