Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Surely bo-unstable == hamm, so please invest your time in hamm, not > > something that will be discarded in a few months. > > > Sure, but why invest my time in hamm which will be obsoleted in half a > year anyway?
Wrong. What is your basis for saying this? > While i like updated components i'm rather conservative > regarding complete system upgrades. For me bo is running fine enough > but i'd like to use a few features only present in more recent > versions of Debian software. What's so bad about being a bit more > oriented towards a user's perspective? Nothing, if you want to you may recompile recent packages for your system. > Well, i prefer to use the few months (pretty much time waiting BTW) > until final release of hamm to upgrade the relyably stable system i'm > working with now. I need software i can use today and can't wait for > tomorrow to happen. Hey, Debian is not Microsoft! I need software I can use today too, and hamm has that software right now. Thanks to all the other developers for their hard work to build that software. Martin. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .