On Sat, Dec 06, 1997 at 04:36:40PM +0200, Fabrizio Polacco wrote: > Most maintainers have a double boot machine (like me), or have a bo > machine on their net, and launching recompilation of latest packages > (after a small change in the changelog file) is a little waste of time > (and gives more benefits). > I remember of one developer who couldn't upgrade his only machine to > hamm; he could only help doing non-maintainer uploads of new packages. > > Pay attention: nobody here is proposing to create a debian-1.4 libc5 > based release! That would be a waste of energies. Only new packages and > security fixes should be libc5-recompiled, not everything.
You've won me over. I've backported a couple of my packages, but only one (guavac) is not new for hamm, or even vaguely well known. However I think that fixing bugs in hamm should probably take priority, but I don't have outstanding here. hamish -- Hamish Moffatt, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5 CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome. http://hamish.home.ml.org -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .