On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 02:20:48PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 04:52:38PM -0400, Mackenzie Morgan wrote: > > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Benjamin Drung <bdr...@debian.org> wrote: > > > Recommends or Suggests: > > > cdbs > > > cmake > > > My reasoning on these two was that some people probably aren't > > interested in switching from cdbs to quilt, so coming across packages > > still using it will be common for a while. CMake is a corollary to > > autoconf and heavily used in KDE-land, which seems like a > > not-insignificant number of packages. > > But in both cases, those should be pulled in as build-depends, no?
Well, I think it is worthwhile to be able to modify and build source packages without having to install the full Build-Depends. Do you usually need to have cmake installed to run the clean target? If so, that might be a reason to include it. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110528142930.gd29...@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org
