-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Le 16/05/12 09:34, Andrey Rahmatullin a ?crit : > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:05:21AM +0200, Olе Streicher wrote: >> I just discovered that debuild does not behave as I would expect >> from the maintainer's guide [1]: >> >> | Cleaning the source and rebuilding the package from your user >> account | is as simple as: | $ debuild [...] | You can clean the >> source tree as simply as: | $ debuild clean >> >> This gives an error if the "dh_clean" does not work on the >> unpatched source, since "debuild" reverts all patches, but >> "debuild clean" does not apply then. I filed a bug report for >> this [2], including a simple example package, but the maintainer >> doesn't see a problem here. > (for the reference) ... because "debuild is just a wrapper around > dpkg-buildpackage" and the behavior "is documented in > dpkg-buildpackage(1)". >
Documented, yes. Rationalized, no. I agree that there's something fishy with the default behaviour: anytime you have to patch a file which is later modified during build, you have to build with -tc IIRC. I agree with Ole that unpatching should never be done before cleaning. Regards, Thibaut. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+zX6UACgkQ+37NkUuUiPEe5QCfZDjHOHmCeu6GIKXWTPlXOxkS TIoAn1sgi+4ufCCc9yTsnYvR3nVDI5gi =ALCr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fb35fa5.5070...@users.sourceforge.net
