Quoting Peter Palfrader (2013-04-25 22:49:36) > On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Simon Chopin wrote: > > > > One of the principles, up to now, of system design for the debian.org > > > infrastructure has been that it can tolerate single nodes being off line > > > for periods of time. My understanding of ZeroMQ is that it doesn't do > > > very well when the sender and the receiver aren't on line at the same > > > time. I have not used ZeroMQ in any serious way, so I'm only repeating > > > what I've heard. Please correct me if I'm wrong. > > > > Well, as I understand it, when sender or receiver are not online, there > > is simply no message passing. If your concern is about what happens to > > the backlog when the consumer comes back online, then I've already > > written about that earlier today :-) > > Does that imply you expect us to run services on core infrastructure > machines that listen to the world?
I don't know where you have read this implication, but no that is certainly not what I meant. PS: Removing the extra MLs from the Cc list. Please keep Ralph in Cc though.
signature.asc
Description: signature