Le Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:09:46AM +0200, Adam Borowski a écrit : > > Also, GNOME does _not_ absolutely need systemd. Proof: Ubuntu. This part > of its packaging in Debian strikes me as being intentionally malicious to > push an agenda. And this is not the first time, we had this with Network > Manager already.
Hi Adam, at this point, I would like to point at a very important part of the "revised code of conduct" that Wouter is proposing: "Assume good faith". http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2013/05/msg00084.html I use GNOME, I like it a lot, and would be extremely disapointed if in the future I can not have it anymore because regular fingerpointing and accusation would be driving out people who undertake a such a heavy task as maintaining a destkop environment. Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131024012552.ga29...@falafel.plessy.net