Le Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:09:46AM +0200, Adam Borowski a écrit :
> 
> Also, GNOME does _not_ absolutely need systemd.  Proof: Ubuntu.  This part
> of its packaging in Debian strikes me as being intentionally malicious to
> push an agenda.  And this is not the first time, we had this with Network
> Manager already.

Hi Adam,

at this point, I would like to point at a very important part of the
"revised code of conduct" that Wouter is proposing: "Assume good faith".

    http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2013/05/msg00084.html

I use GNOME, I like it a lot, and would be extremely disapointed if in the
future I can not have it anymore because regular fingerpointing and accusation
would be driving out people who undertake a such a heavy task as maintaining a
destkop environment.

Cheers,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131024012552.ga29...@falafel.plessy.net

Reply via email to