On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:25:52AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:09:46AM +0200, Adam Borowski a écrit : > > > > Also, GNOME does _not_ absolutely need systemd. Proof: Ubuntu. This part > > of its packaging in Debian strikes me as being intentionally malicious to > > push an agenda. And this is not the first time, we had this with Network > > Manager already. > > at this point, I would like to point at a very important part of the > "revised code of conduct" that Wouter is proposing: "Assume good faith". > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2013/05/msg00084.html
My apologies, I overreacted. I'm fed up with repeated attempts to force components on the rest of the system, but that's mostly a fault of Gnome's upstream, who are not even malicious themselves but merely don't care about portability to other systems. They don't get paid for making it work on Debian nor *BSD. The way both Network Manager (twice) and now systemd are pushed in the Debian packaging does leave a bad taste, but I should have limited my (harsh already) words to merely "pushing an agenda". The word "malicious" was really uncalled for. Deep apologies. -- ᛊᚨᚾᛁᛏᚣ᛫ᛁᛊ᛫ᚠᛟᚱ᛫ᚦᛖ᛫ᚹᛖᚨᚲ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131024020300.gb30...@angband.pl
