On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:19:30 +0900, hero...@gentoo.org wrote: > Tollef Fog Heen <tfh...@err.no> writes: >> >> It's probably better to just contribute your changes to the sysv-rc >> version and so make that one able to manage openrc in addition to the >> others it already knows how to. No point in forking it. > > Forking was a decision made by me in the early phase of packaging > OpenRC. At that time I referred to the way file-rc handled update-rc.d > as in > > sysvinit: /usr/share/sysvinit/update-rc.d > > A central package providing update-rc.d and invoke-rc.d is nice. > Though it should not be sysv-rc, which OpenRC is intending to replace.
What features does sysvinit+openrc have that sysvinit+sysv-rc+insserv doesn't have?
https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem/openrc doesn't make that case and none of the members of the CTTE explained their "openrc > sysvinit" votes (unless I missed that point in the 100s/1000s of #727708 posts).
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5305fcf8.90...@gmail.com
