Hi! On Wed, 2022-12-14 at 15:27:18 +0100, Juri Grabowski wrote: > Package: wnpp > Version: 1.79 > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Juri Grabowski <deb...@jugra.de> > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, deb...@jugra.de
> * Package name : distribution-gpg-keys > Version : 1.7.9 > Upstream Author : Miroslav Suchý <msu...@redhat.com> > * URL : https://github.com/xsuchy/distribution-gpg-keys/ > * License : CC0-1.0 > Programming Lang: data > Description : GPG keys by various Linux distributions > > used by various Linux distributions to sign packages. > > needed by mock/3.5 and I need a sponsor for this package. See current > packaging in > https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-rpm-team/distribution-gpg-keys > After I know ITP bug number I upload this source package to > https://mentors.debian.net/package/distribution-gpg-keys/ The project name talks about gpg keys, but those are really OpenPGP keys (or even better, certificates). I've asked upstream to rename the project to avoid this common confusion. So you might want to wait until that's settled to avoid multiple trips over NEW. <https://github.com/xsuchy/distribution-gpg-keys/issues/76> (If this project is also intended to only cover RPM-based distributions, as Adam brought up, you might want to further ask them to make that clear from the project name, say rpm-distribution-openpgp-keys or similar. But in any case regardless of the intended target use, it still seems like a very generic name which can be easily confused for a package that would be needed for Debian, or derivatives.) Thanks, Guillem
