On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 03:12:21PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Wed, 2022-12-14 at 15:27:18 +0100, Juri Grabowski wrote: > > * Package name : distribution-gpg-keys > > Upstream Author : Miroslav Suchý <msu...@redhat.com> > > * URL : https://github.com/xsuchy/distribution-gpg-keys/ > > Description : GPG keys by various Linux distributions > > > > used by various Linux distributions to sign packages. > > > > needed by mock/3.5 and I need a sponsor for this package. See current > > packaging in > > https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-rpm-team/distribution-gpg-keys > > After I know ITP bug number I upload this source package to > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/distribution-gpg-keys/
> (If this project is also intended to only cover RPM-based distributions, > as Adam brought up, you might want to further ask them to make that clear > from the project name, say rpm-distribution-openpgp-keys or similar. When in that project's native environment, ie a RPM distribution, the name _is_ adequate. It's only in Debian (/Alpine/Arch/Gentoo/...) where the name can be confusing. But then, there's no requirement for the package name to match upstream. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Quis trollabit ipsos trollos? ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
