On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 05:58:54AM +0000, Daniel Markstedt wrote: > > wolfssl is packaged in Debian, did you try to build netatalk with the > > packaged version? > > > > Debian doesn't like code copies in sources, so if it builds fine with > > the packaged version, removing it from the source that ends up in > > Debian will fix all issues. > > > > This is a reasonable request. I did try to build with Debian's WolfSSL > libraries last year. > At the time (September 2023) I concluded that the DES compatibility headers > (des.h etc.) were missing altogether from Debian's WolfSSL package, and > therefore could not be used for this purpose with Netatalk.
libwolfssl-dev: /usr/include/wolfssl/openssl/des.h -- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature