Simon McVittie <[email protected]> writes: >>Also >>Salsa CI does not stop testing i386 packages even if the source package >>is designed to not build them. > > This part, at least, could be solved by the Salsa-CI team making the > i386 build opt-in rather than opt-out
Please not - I find that the Salsa i386 CI job catches 32-bit issues in a cost-effective way, and in my experience ~95% of packages the i386 build "just works" and provides a good regression check for many issues on armhf too. It would be nice if Salsa would automatically disable the i386 job if debian/control said 'architecture-is-64bit' though. I share the frustration with supporting 32-bit archs though, but it hasn't a lot to do with the Salsa i386 job. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
