-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On 19-Jan-99 Anthony Towns wrote: > "Agreeing" with the DFSG in a fairly important part of that -- our major > aim is to produce a free system, and if we can't even agree on what that > means then we're not going to get *anywhere*. >
Not necessarily. Agreeing to "abide by" the DFSG is more important than agreeing with the "DFSG". Many people don't "agree with" the patch clause but they accept it as part of the DFSG and abide by it because Debian as a whole has accepted it into the current DFSG. ========================================================================= * http://benham.net/index.html <>< * * -------------------- * -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- ---------------* * Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 * * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++>++++ P+++$ L++>++++* * KC7YAQ * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- * * Debian Developer * PE++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5 X R+ !tv b++++ DI+++ D++ * * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * G++>G+++ e h+ r* y+ * * -------------------- * ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ---------------* ========================================================================= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3a Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBNqQzxrbps1lIfUYBAQHu+gP/SnBoR3jkOLzYwihUxqwkc024mWRRYg50 IBxDOKdvTlZrp5i9YgpR9fRdbbWuI+yJpeLlDYQRNTqO8sR5aYvJATMHgIF2GURy nqGaIZlNp6qIIKURV2umHJ8niylRR2z7ZT+7RhRMJoYE45TGiuV2ObYIspqrv3gn 5gUo4CEEgmo= =Ht9g -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
