Hi, in the process of overhauling the ldap tree, I am thinking about renaming ou=group to ou=groups in order to better reflect the plural form.
I don't know why ou=group was chosen, perhaps because the expired and in the meantime deleted RFC2307bis used ou=group in an example. I cannot imagine that using ou=group or ou=groups makes any difference for storing our possix groups, but from what I have seen, it looks as if using ou=groups is more common and the linguistic correct form. The change is not worth an argument, but I think as we need to make some changes in ldap with the upcoming release anyway, we should use that chance to also improve that little thing. Neither using ou=groups nor ou=group is a big deal, but we have to live for some (hopefully long) time with what we choose now ... What do you think? Best regards, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-edu-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110215095811.GA4282@flashgordon