On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:18:25AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Andreas B. Mundt] > > I don't know why ou=group was chosen, > > It was selected because it is the proposal in the only known document > proposing a standardized LDAP structure, the draft available from > <URL:http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-howard-rfc2307bis-02>. I saw no > need to divert from this proposal.
Yeah, I looked into that too, but I think it's really just an example. I don't think using ou=group or ou=groups is of any technical relevance. > > I cannot imagine that using ou=group or ou=groups makes any > > difference for storing our possix groups, but from what I have seen, > > it looks as if using ou=groups is more common and the linguistic > > correct form. > > How do you determine that ou=groups is more common? >From books, mails, examples: > At the University of Oslo, cn=filegroups and cn=netgroups are used. :) cn=filegroups and cn=netgroups , both with the plural 's' ... > The former represent the cn=group subtree in Skolelinux. In > db.debian.org, file groups are stored in the ou=users subtree. ... ou=user_s_ Best regards, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-edu-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110215105622.GA10981@flashgordon