On 6/26/2026 11:22 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
So you are making conclusions from the fact that, for almost all Emacs versions since Emacs 26 till now, we decided another NN.x release after NN.2 was not justified, and _then_ started the release cycle for NN+1. IOW, the cause and effect are the other way around.
Oh, I see. I was under the impression that there was a preferred amount of time between major releases, and then minor releases just fit in there as needed. I don't have a strong opinion on which way would be better, though I imagine that starting the release cycle for NN+1 only after we've decided not to do any more NN releases is less work (or at least, less work happening simultaneously).
