On Sat, Jun 27, 2026 at 6:30 PM Jim Porter <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 6/26/2026 11:22 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > So you are making conclusions from the fact that, for almost all Emacs > > versions since Emacs 26 till now, we decided another NN.x release > > after NN.2 was not justified, and _then_ started the release cycle for > > NN+1. IOW, the cause and effect are the other way around. > > Oh, I see. I was under the impression that there was a preferred amount > of time between major releases, and then minor releases just fit in > there as needed. I don't have a strong opinion on which way would be > better, though I imagine that starting the release cycle for NN+1 only > after we've decided not to do any more NN releases is less work (or at > least, less work happening simultaneously). > I sense that with igc potentially on the verge of merging into master that 32 will come faster just because of its all-intrusive nature.
