>What's the hold-up on the sid->woody move for gcc-3.0 (I haven't seen >update-excuses yet)? I can't think of any reason to keep the version in >woody around at all...
It has an RC bug, #105246. Update-excuses also mentions some problem with the doc packages but this looks like it may be spurious. * out of date on alpha: cpp-3.0-doc, g77-3.0-doc, gcc-3.0-base, gcc-3.0-doc, libstdc++3-doc (from 3.0.1.ds0-0pre010721) * there are up to date bins in alpha also (It's the same for arm, m68k, ppc and sparc.) It's tempting to downgrade #105246 to "important" and allow this stuff into testing. Although it seems like quite a bad bug for C++ people on arm, given a choice between living with it and releasing with what's currently in woody I would be inclined to do the former. And it's not as if arm would be left completely without a working C++ compiler: there's always g++-2.95. p.
pgpOyHqh5eTQI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
