Luk Claes schrieb: > Matthias Klose wrote: >> Matthias Klose schrieb: >>> There are some more regressions fixed on the gcc-4_3-branch. At least >>> for some of those we should consider an update. I scanned the branch >>> for wrong-code regressions with -O2/-O3 and prepared an update at [1]. >>> No regressions found in the testsuite on i386 and powerpc. The >>> alternative could be an update to the current gcc-4_3-branch as found >>> in experimental; no regressions in the testsuite, the code in this >>> state gets more attention upstream, and I didn't see any regressions >>> with these updates in Ubuntu (intrepid and jaunty, subset of archs). >>> Proposing to upload the packages at [1] now, and (after migration to >>> testing) upload the packages from experimental to unstable. Uploads >>> of gcj-4.3 and gnat-4.3 should follow the gcc-4.3. uploads. >> [1] http://people.debian.org/~doko/gcc/4.3/ > > Ok, please go ahead.
now in unstable, built on all archs, afaics no regressions in the testsuite. please consider this version for testing. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
