Luk Claes schrieb:
> Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Matthias Klose schrieb:
>>> There are some more regressions fixed on the gcc-4_3-branch.  At least
>>> for some of those we should consider an update. I scanned the branch
>>> for wrong-code regressions with -O2/-O3 and prepared an update at [1].
>>> No regressions found in the testsuite on i386 and powerpc.  The
>>> alternative could be an update to the current gcc-4_3-branch as found
>>> in experimental; no regressions in the testsuite, the code in this
>>> state gets more attention upstream, and I didn't see any regressions
>>> with these updates in Ubuntu (intrepid and jaunty, subset of archs).
>>> Proposing to upload the packages at [1] now, and (after migration to
>>> testing) upload the packages from experimental to unstable.  Uploads
>>> of gcj-4.3 and gnat-4.3 should follow the gcc-4.3. uploads.
>> [1] http://people.debian.org/~doko/gcc/4.3/
> 
> Ok, please go ahead.

now in unstable, built on all archs, afaics no regressions in the testsuite.
please consider this version for testing.

  Matthias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to