Luk Claes schrieb: > Matthias Klose wrote: >> Luk Claes schrieb: >>> Matthias Klose wrote: >>>> Matthias Klose schrieb: >>>>> There are some more regressions fixed on the gcc-4_3-branch. At least >>>>> for some of those we should consider an update. I scanned the branch >>>>> for wrong-code regressions with -O2/-O3 and prepared an update at [1]. >>>>> No regressions found in the testsuite on i386 and powerpc. The >>>>> alternative could be an update to the current gcc-4_3-branch as found >>>>> in experimental; no regressions in the testsuite, the code in this >>>>> state gets more attention upstream, and I didn't see any regressions >>>>> with these updates in Ubuntu (intrepid and jaunty, subset of archs). >>>>> Proposing to upload the packages at [1] now, and (after migration to >>>>> testing) upload the packages from experimental to unstable. Uploads >>>>> of gcj-4.3 and gnat-4.3 should follow the gcc-4.3. uploads. >>>> [1] http://people.debian.org/~doko/gcc/4.3/ >>> Ok, please go ahead. >> now in unstable, built on all archs, afaics no regressions in the testsuite. >> please consider this version for testing. > > gcc-4.3 and gcj-4.3 already migrated, gnat-4.3 is already unblocked
thanks, however I didn't upload gcj-4.3 yet. will do on Sat/Sun. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
