Luk Claes schrieb:
> Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Luk Claes schrieb:
>>> Matthias Klose wrote:
>>>> Matthias Klose schrieb:
>>>>> There are some more regressions fixed on the gcc-4_3-branch.  At least
>>>>> for some of those we should consider an update. I scanned the branch
>>>>> for wrong-code regressions with -O2/-O3 and prepared an update at [1].
>>>>> No regressions found in the testsuite on i386 and powerpc.  The
>>>>> alternative could be an update to the current gcc-4_3-branch as found
>>>>> in experimental; no regressions in the testsuite, the code in this
>>>>> state gets more attention upstream, and I didn't see any regressions
>>>>> with these updates in Ubuntu (intrepid and jaunty, subset of archs).
>>>>> Proposing to upload the packages at [1] now, and (after migration to
>>>>> testing) upload the packages from experimental to unstable.  Uploads
>>>>> of gcj-4.3 and gnat-4.3 should follow the gcc-4.3. uploads.
>>>> [1] http://people.debian.org/~doko/gcc/4.3/
>>> Ok, please go ahead.
>> now in unstable, built on all archs, afaics no regressions in the testsuite.
>> please consider this version for testing.
> 
> gcc-4.3 and gcj-4.3 already migrated, gnat-4.3 is already unblocked

thanks, however I didn't upload gcj-4.3 yet. will do on Sat/Sun.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to