On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 16:55:20 -0800 Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > it has Gnome's look/feel and is easier to use than mozilla is > > "Easier to use" is a relative term, and mozilla is much more > reconfigurable than most people realize (or care:). Plus, it's "reconfigurable" means nothing to my sister ;) > Basically, I think we should do what we can to encourage the use of > galeon with gnome, but we should stop short of forcing people to > install and use galeon if they prefer mozilla (or even something > else). yup, agreed > Therefore, I think the gnome task should include galeon, but > gnome-moz-browser should probably depend on "galeon | www-browser". > (Or, perhaps, depend on www-browser and recommend and default-to > galeon.) that's the goal... we won't be forcing, the point is creating a 'gnome' meta package which depends on the defaults, and let people choose whatever they want > > I think it is time for Debian Gnome folks learn from KDE what > > "integration" means > > No doubt. On the other hand, one of the advantages of Gnome over KDE > (IMO) is its greater flexibility. I can (at least in theory) use any > of several gnome-compliant window-managers, mail-readers, etc. Having > a default is good. Having a restriction is bad. I think galeon is a > good default, but it shouldn't be a requirement. sure, that's one of the advantages Gnome has, and should be kept but it is important to have a good default for those who doesn't care choosing and want a working thing out of the box, a task is by no means a restriction it is just the best default one can think of, and that's what integration means, IMO []s! -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gustavo Noronha <http://www.metainfo.org/kov> Debian: <http://www.debian.org> * <http://debian-br.cipsga.org.br>
