Tomasz Wegrzanowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > KGI is quite portable (some parts needs to be non-preemptive, possible on > Mach ?)
Why does it require that -- does it work on multiprocessors at all? > I'm not going to try compiling gnumach in *near* term. > I had enough bad experience with Linux 2.3 > and am affraid of kernels since then. Do you fear compiling it, or running the result? > BTW : what about idea, that mach should save all booting messages > into RAM and then redirect it to userspace ? That would be good.
