On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 08:55:50PM +0300, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote: > Tomasz Wegrzanowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > KGI is quite portable (some parts needs to be non-preemptive, possible on > > Mach ?) > > Why does it require that -- does it work on multiprocessors at > all?
It was said that KGI needs to block brige (?) when doing some operations (changing modes?) on some cards (dunno which ones) > > I'm not going to try compiling gnumach in *near* term. > > I had enough bad experience with Linux 2.3 > > and am affraid of kernels since then. > > Do you fear compiling it, or running the result? running the result