On Monday, April 15, 2013 13:18:14 Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2013-04-15, Thorsten Glaser <t...@mirbsd.de> wrote: > > Maybe kdepim should Depends virtuoso-minimal and either > > depend on akonadi 1.9 or break akonadi < 1.9 ? > > At least something related to akonadi has already been committed to the > git packaging repository. There is likely a few other rough ends here > and there. Is virtuoso-minimal a hard requirement for kdepim? >
My understanding is that kmail2 needs nepomuk and akonadi to work, and its Nepomuk that has a hard dependency on virtuoso. Akonadi is incompatible with virtuoso and needs its own seperate dbm to work. I think there was some wizard like capabilities built into kmail for configuring mail. Also I sometimes found akonadiconsole useful in trying to visualize the stack of modules working to pull in PIM & mail data. diane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2628261.1nPd94r2eh@myrada
