On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 23:21:32 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: > On Sat, 15 Jun 2024 16:48:58 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > Once again, please accept the "patch" and incorporate the files (or > > further enhanced versions of them) into linux-cpupower. > > Have you had a chance to take a look at the three files I sent? > Could you test them? > > I really hope they can soon be incorporated into the official > linux-cpupower Debian package...
Another version of linux-cpupower (along with the other binary packages from src:linux, of course) migrated to Debian testing. Still, no feedback about the three files I sent to address this bug (#894906)... Please take a look at the files, test them, and incorporate them into the official linux-cpupower Debian package. Or, if there's something that is not right about them, please let me know, and help me to improve them. Package cpufrequtils has been [removed] from Debian on 16 June 2024, and the three files I sent are the only missing piece (as far as I know) for linux-cpupower to be a perfect replacement. I guess many users are waiting for this feature. [removed]: <https://tracker.debian.org/news/1537421/removed-008-2-from-unstable/> Let's fill this gap once and for all! Thanks for your time. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpQX2JfyT_hn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
