In gmane.linux.debian.internationalization.general Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(I hope news.gmame is working ok) > Newsgroups: > gmane.linux.debian.internationalization.portuguese,gmane.linux.debian.internationalization.general > > Sorry, I have a stupid question here: are you portuguese speaker yourself ? > I am not, but I've seen several times peoples from both pt and pt_BR team > asking for clearly separate the two languages, because they DO differ (IIRC). > > So, I cannot say myself that such change is wrong, but I would like to hear > from those lists before going further on that way. > > That's why I CCed their ML to have their advice. I'm portuguese from Portugal. I'm not asking to unify Portuguese (pt) and Brasilian (pt_BR). I'm just asking to not have pt_PT language, as it is the same as pt. I've asked once in irc and people from Brazil agreed that we could settle for pt and pt_BR. There's no need for pt_PT. > Thanks, Mt. > > On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 01:21:07AM +0100, Bruno Rodrigues wrote: >> Is it possible to have language aggregation in [1]? >> >> For example, pt_PT has only 8 files. It would be great if were possible >> to rename them to pt.po, but Abiword, horde2, imp3, turba, mnemo and >> squirrelmail all use only xx_XX format, so it would be difficult to ask >> upstream to rename them. >> >> >> [1] http://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po/ >> >> -- >> Bruno Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>