On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 05:52:36PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > Em Mon, 26 May 2003 18:05:18 +0000 (UTC), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruno Rodrigues) > escreveu: > > > I'm portuguese from Portugal. > > > > I'm not asking to unify Portuguese (pt) and Brasilian (pt_BR). I'm just > > asking to not have pt_PT language, as it is the same as pt. > > > > I've asked once in irc and people from Brazil agreed that we could > > settle for pt and pt_BR. There's no need for pt_PT.
At the moment there are only 2 packages listed under http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po/pt_PT When bugs are filed against these packages and they are fixed, pt_PT will vanish ;) > I'm from the pt_BR team and since I became part of the team we use > the -portuguese stuff. That's wrong, I think, we should be using > -brazillian, to leave -portuguese for pt_PT people. [...] For my information, why is Brazillian Portuguese not defined in ISO-639? It would make things simpler for everyone. Denis