debian-legal
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Later messages
Messages by Date
2021/09/24
Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums
Chuck Zmudzinski
2021/09/24
Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums
Chuck Zmudzinski
2021/09/24
Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums
Jonathan Carter
2021/09/24
Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums
Chuck Zmudzinski
2021/09/14
Re: Advice needed for licensing in modus-themes
Paul Wise
2021/09/14
Re: Advice needed for licensing in modus-themes
Dhavan V
2021/09/13
Re: Advice needed for licensing in modus-themes
Protesilaos Stavrou
2021/09/13
Advice needed for licensing in modus-themes
Dhavan V
2021/09/13
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Lucas Nussbaum
2021/09/12
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Sam Hartman
2021/09/11
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Ole Tange
2021/09/07
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Lucas Nussbaum
2021/09/07
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Lucas Nussbaum
2021/09/06
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Ole Tange
2021/09/03
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Felix Lechner
2021/09/03
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Tobias Frost
2021/09/03
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Sam Hartman
2021/09/03
Re: I need help my acct was hacked
Andrew M.A. Cater
2021/09/02
I need help my acct was hacked
Scarlett Kelley
2021/08/31
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Ole Tange
2021/08/31
Re: Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian
Francesco Poli
2021/08/30
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Tobias Frost
2021/08/30
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Tobias Frost
2021/08/30
Re: Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian
Tobias Frost
2021/08/30
Re: Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian
Jeffrey H. Johnson
2021/08/30
Re: List of journal
Walter Landry
2021/08/30
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Ole Tange
2021/08/30
List of journal
Bastien ROUCARIES
2021/08/30
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Andreas Tille
2021/08/30
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Felix Lechner
2021/08/30
Re: Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian
Francesco Poli
2021/08/30
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Tobias Frost
2021/08/29
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Andreas Tille
2021/08/29
Re: Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian
Walter Landry
2021/08/29
Re: Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian
J.B. Nicholson
2021/08/29
Re: Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian
J.B. Nicholson
2021/08/29
Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian
Jeffrey H. Johnson
2021/08/11
Re: Concern about a Sun license
Pierre Gruet
2021/08/10
Re: Concern about a Sun license
Walter Landry
2021/08/10
Re: Concern about a Sun license
Francesco Poli
2021/08/10
Concern about a Sun license
Pierre Gruet
2021/07/29
"Andronix" app reselling paid version of Debian, potentially violating GPL and Debian trademarks?
Rishub
2021/07/26
Re: Dúvida sobre licenciamento CRM Public License Version 1.0
Francesco Poli
2021/07/26
Re: Dúvida sobre licenciamento CRM Public License Version 1.0
Francesco Poli
2021/07/25
Re: Dúvida sobre licenciamento CRM Public License Version 1.0
Walter Landry
2021/07/25
Dúvida sobre licenciamento CRM Public License Version 1.0
Guilherme Xavier
2021/07/14
Re: cowsay questionable files
Bone Baboon
2021/07/13
Re: Legal status of Audacity in releases newer than Bullseye
Mihai Moldovan
2021/07/12
Re: Legal status of Audacity in releases newer than Bullseye
Sam Hartman
2021/07/12
Re: Legal status of Audacity in releases newer than Bullseye
Bone Baboon
2021/07/11
cowsay questionable files
Bone Baboon
2021/07/07
Re: Legal status of Audacity in releases newer than Bullseye
Jonathan Carter
2021/07/04
Re: Legal status of Audacity in releases newer than Bullseye
Daniel Hakimi
2021/07/04
Re: Legal status of Audacity in releases newer than Bullseye
Paul Wise
2021/07/04
Legal status of Audacity in releases newer than Bullseye
jorkanofaln
2021/06/21
Re: MIT Licensed code in LD_PRELOAD?
Ole Streicher
2021/06/21
Re: Declaring license for autogenerated file (W3C)
Diego M. Rodriguez
2021/06/21
Re: MIT Licensed code in LD_PRELOAD?
Francesco Poli
2021/06/21
Re: MIT Licensed code in LD_PRELOAD?
Sam Hartman
2021/06/21
MIT Licensed code in LD_PRELOAD?
Marc Haber
2021/06/18
Re: Rust trademark policy
Bone Baboon
2021/06/18
Re: Declaring license for autogenerated file (W3C)
Paul Wise
2021/06/18
Re: Declaring license for autogenerated file (W3C)
Michael Lustfield
2021/06/18
Re: Declaring license for autogenerated file (W3C)
Diego M. Rodriguez
2021/06/17
Re: Declaring license for autogenerated file (W3C)
Michael Lustfield
2021/06/17
Re: Declaring license for autogenerated file (W3C)
Sam Hartman
2021/06/17
Declaring license for autogenerated file (W3C)
Diego M. Rodriguez
2021/06/03
Re: Rust trademark policy
Bone Baboon
2021/06/03
Re: Rust trademark policy
Bone Baboon
2021/06/03
Re: Rust trademark policy
Bone Baboon
2021/06/03
Re: Bug#974678: ITP: openh264 -- H.264 encoding and decoding
Sam Hartman
2021/06/02
Re: Bug#974678: ITP: openh264 -- H.264 encoding and decoding
Walter Landry
2021/06/02
Re: Bug#974678: ITP: openh264 -- H.264 encoding and decoding
Bastian Germann
2021/05/29
Re: Rust trademark policy
Walter Landry
2021/05/29
Rust trademark policy
Bone Baboon
2021/05/16
DATAS PROTECTION AND FRAMEWORK SUPPORT
HEYJEY789
2021/05/11
GPL and embedded software in a custom ISO
Sileno de Oliveira Brito
2021/05/10
Re: Copyright notice gives info on source files, not the packaged binaries -is that correct?
Paul Wise
2021/05/10
Re: Copyright notice gives info on source files, not the packaged binaries -is that correct?
Sam Hartman
2021/05/10
Copyright notice gives info on source files, not the packaged binaries -is that correct?
Alexander Mazuruk
2021/03/28
Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency
Paul Wise
2021/03/28
Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency
Carlos Henrique Lima Melara
2021/03/03
Debian-legal, Nice to know that you do camera business. #JllvJFSW #
kevin
2021/02/28
New Year Greetings!
Cherry
2021/02/22
Re: LGPLv2+ depending on (LGPLv3+ or GPLv2+) = (LGPLv3+ or GPLv2+)?
Walter Landry
2021/02/22
LGPLv2+ depending on (LGPLv3+ or GPLv2+) = (LGPLv3+ or GPLv2+)?
Andreas Metzler
2021/02/03
Debian-legal, look forward to our cooperation! 02/04/2021 12:03:34 jfnvqmgr
zhenli
2021/01/27
COUROMODA 2021 - Attendees List
mary smith
2021/01/25
I am a link builder & I've a good number of quality sites
Jack Charlie
2021/01/23
Re: gnome-screensaver copyright issues
Dennis Filder
2021/01/23
Re: gnome-screensaver copyright issues
Bastian Blank
2021/01/23
gnome-screensaver copyright issues
Dennis Filder
2021/01/20
Re: License and Copyright info for debconf translation of aide package
Francesco Poli
2021/01/20
License and Copyright info for debconf translation of aide package
Marc Haber
2021/01/08
Geant4 license (again).
Stephan Lachnit
2021/01/08
Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency
Francesco Poli
2021/01/08
Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency
Andrew M.A. Cater
2021/01/07
Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency
Carlos Henrique Lima Melara
2021/01/06
Re: GPL-2-only packages using GPL-3+ readline
Francesco Poli
2021/01/04
Re: Copyright of debian/*
Christoph Biedl
2021/01/03
Re: Bug#979095: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
2021/01/02
Re: Copyright of debian/*
Matthew Vernon
2021/01/02
Re: Copyright of debian/*
David Prévot
2021/01/02
Re: GPL-2-only packages using GPL-3+ readline
Jim Wright
2021/01/02
Re: GPL-2-only packages using GPL-3+ readline
John Scott
2021/01/02
Re: Copyright of debian/*
John Scott
2021/01/02
Copyright of debian/*
Matthew Vernon
2021/01/02
Re: GPL-2-only packages using GPL-3+ readline
Simon McVittie
2021/01/01
GPL-2-only packages using GPL-3+ readline
Bastian Germann
2020/12/12
Re: do SPDX declaration fulfill §17 of GPL?
Florian Weimer
2020/12/10
Looking for a Minecraft Server?
PUSCraft
2020/12/10
do SPDX declaration fulfill §17 of GPL?
Nicholas D Steeves
2020/12/07
Re: Haftungsausschluss
Geert Stappers
2020/11/16
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
David Bannon
2020/11/16
Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa?
Hayden Barnes
2020/11/16
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
Paul Wise
2020/11/15
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
David Bannon
2020/11/12
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
David Bannon
2020/11/11
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
Paul Wise
2020/11/11
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
David Bannon
2020/11/09
CC logos
Markus Demleitner
2020/11/06
Re: whitakers-words_0.2020.10.27-1_multi.changes REJECTED
calumlikesapplepie
2020/11/06
Re: whitakers-words_0.2020.10.27-1_multi.changes REJECTED
Joerg Jaspert
2020/11/05
Re: whitakers-words_0.2020.10.27-1_multi.changes REJECTED
Walter Landry
2020/11/05
Re: whitakers-words_0.2020.10.27-1_multi.changes REJECTED
calumlikesapplepie
2020/11/01
Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa?
Wouter Verhelst
2020/11/01
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
David Bannon
2020/11/01
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
Paul Wise
2020/11/01
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
David Bannon
2020/10/31
breach
Deana Gadola
2020/10/30
Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa?
Steve Cotton
2020/10/30
Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa?
Domenico Andreoli
2020/10/30
Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa?
Roberto
2020/10/30
Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa?
Pierre-Elliott Bécue
2020/10/30
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
Paul Wise
2020/10/30
Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa?
Pirate Praveen
2020/10/30
Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa?
Philip Hands
2020/10/30
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
David Bannon
2020/10/29
Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa?
Daniel Leidert
2020/10/29
Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa?
Craig Small
2020/10/29
Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa?
Dominik George
2020/10/29
Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa?
Hayden Barnes
2020/10/29
Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa?
Rogério Brito
2020/10/22
Stratégie de développement 2021
Paweł Skorzyński
2020/10/19
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
Paul Wise
2020/10/12
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
Tobias Frost
2020/10/08
Re: License of "debian/" directories
Hong Xu
2020/10/08
Re: License of "debian/" directories
Paul Tagliamonte
2020/10/08
License of "debian/" directories
Joel Ray Holveck
2020/10/05
Disinfectant
Ethan Smith
2020/09/30
Help apple iPhones
April Hayes
2020/09/24
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
David Bannon
2020/09/24
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
Tobias Frost
2020/09/23
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
David Bannon
2020/09/20
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
David Bannon
2020/09/20
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
Tobias Frost
2020/09/18
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
David Bannon
2020/09/14
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
Tobias Frost
2020/09/13
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
David Bannon
2020/09/12
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
Paul Wise
2020/09/12
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
Daniel Hakimi
2020/09/11
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
David Bannon
2020/09/11
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
Paul Wise
2020/09/11
tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
David Bannon
2020/08/27
MCC : O/F export from China to Manila
coco
2020/08/16
Re: BSDish licenses without explicit modification permission
Richard Fontana
2020/08/10
Disinfection
Liam Brown
2020/08/02
Richiesta Contatto
Maria Puccini
2020/07/22
Disinfectant
Liam Brown
2020/07/11
Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work
Adrian Bunk
2020/07/11
Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work
Francesco Poli
2020/07/11
Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work
Florian Weimer
2020/07/11
Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work
Giovanni Mascellani
2020/07/10
Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work
Adrian Bunk
2020/07/10
Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work
Nicholas D Steeves
2020/07/10
Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work
Nicholas D Steeves
2020/07/10
Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work
Adrian Bunk
2020/07/10
Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work
Nicholas D Steeves
2020/07/10
Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work
Adrian Bunk
2020/07/02
Re: Subpoena regarding ongoing patent matter
Jonathan Carter
2020/07/01
Re: Subpoena regarding ongoing patent matter
Daniel Hakimi
2020/07/01
Re: Subpoena regarding ongoing patent matter
vheu...@heuserlawoffice.com
2020/06/30
Subpoena regarding ongoing patent matter
Van Handel, Michael
2020/06/25
Legal assistance needed urgently!
P.T. Jvckenwood Indonesia
2020/06/18
Re: BSDish licenses without explicit modification permission
Paul Wise
2020/06/17
Not going to enforce the license? Pick a more lax, permissive free software license.
J.B. Nicholson
2020/06/17
Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change
Michael Tremer
2020/06/17
Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change
Michael Tremer
2020/06/16
Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change
J.B. Nicholson
2020/06/16
Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change
Tobias Frost
2020/06/16
Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change
John Scott
2020/06/16
Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change
Michael Tremer
2020/06/15
Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change
Mihai Moldovan
2020/06/15
CC-BY 4.0
Roberto
2020/06/15
Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change
Daniel Hakimi
2020/06/15
Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change
Michael Tremer
2020/06/15
Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change
Francesco Poli
2020/06/15
Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change
Roberto
2020/06/15
Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change
Francesco Poli
2020/06/15
Re: Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change
Michael Tremer
Earlier messages
Later messages