On 3/9/07, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For a lot of wifi cards (dunno about Intel's) it's regulatory - they
> can't sell cards that can be easily modified to exceed FCC limits, so
> they limit it in a binary firmware. If they gave away the source,
> people could easily modify the card to exceed the legal output power,
> and thus they can't give away source.
This sounds like another cheap excuse: I cannot believe that the law
really says that *Intel* is responsible if *I* modify an Intel WiFi card
so that it exceeds regulatory limits... If there indeed is a law like
this in some jurisdiction, well, the law should be changed ASAP.
Intel should be able to sell easily-reprogrammable WiFi cards: if *I*
modify one card and exceed regulatory limits, I should be seen as the
*sole* responsible.
While I agree that this isn't an excuse for not freeing it, it's *NOT*
whether Intel is responsible, it's that they don't want you doing it
anyway.
ie. A crowbar can be used to break in to a house. I can give you one
and not be responsible if you break into a house, but maybe I don't
want you to anyway, so I won't give you one.
--
Andrew Donnellan
ajdlinuxATgmailDOTcom (primary) ajdlinuxATexemailDOTcomDOTau (secure)
http://andrewdonnellan.com http://ajdlinux.wordpress.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hkp://subkeys.pgp.net 0x5D4C0C58
http://linux.org.au http://debian.org
Get free rewards - http://ezyrewards.com/?id=23484
Spammers only === [EMAIL PROTECTED] ===
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]