Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's likewise nice to see we're back to "-legal" not being a mailing > list, but an unconstituted advisory body that manages to be a > responsible body, somehow. > > Yeesh.
The distinction above is clearly being made for sarcastic purpose. I still don't understand it, though. Can you please, as DPL, explain what point is being made here? Outside the context of this discussion about trademarks. What do *you*, as DPL, think debian-legal should be, and how is it currently different to that ideal? -- \ "I have the simplest tastes. I am always satisfied with the | `\ best." -- Oscar Wilde | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
