Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] but when either group purports to be stating official > Debian policy, or starts attacking the people who do make such policy, > that becomes actively harmful to the purpose of this list and the goals > of the project.
But, despite writing that lists can't be assigned blame, here we go again! The *group* attacks the policy-makers, does it? Where? *It's a mailing list.* It doesn't get pissed off, it doesn't get happy, it doesn't get sad, it doesn't laugh at your jokes... it just resends emails! For the avoidance of doubt, -legal didn't attack aj for making not much progress on the debian trademark as DPL, or for the SPI board he advised failing to consider the trademark policies its trademark committee drafted. I did, and I give my opinion only, as mentioned in almost every sig and web site I post. I think the Anthony Towns DPLship was not a fun time for those trying to fix legal bugs and it should have been ended sooner. The most significant progress seemed to be the delegation of trademark and copyright instruction to Branden Robinson (which I linked in the summary), but then those things seemed to return to DPL control again somehow. Has the delegation ended or what? Probably the simplest way forwards is to post the four policies drafted so far, then choose between them, with any minor amendments. I'll check whether I can make the fourth one public and then do that. Regards, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
