On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 04:52:46PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Short summary, two potential freeness issues: > * the contributor indemnification clause, > * the patent retaliation clause.
Thanks Josselin and Ben for the replies so far. > This clause is really borderline. It could be seen as an additional > cost, but it clearly protects only against consequences of the > distributor's own actions, something for which a contributor shouldn't > be liable anyway. Ok, so if the latter part of your reasoning is right I don't have to worry to much about this, do I? > Patent retaliation clause, applicable to patents unrelated to the > software. IIRC this was already declared non-free. Comments from other on this? /me hoping your memory is faulty :) Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what? [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
