Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 04:52:46PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Patent retaliation clause, applicable to patents unrelated to the > > software. IIRC this was already declared non-free. > > Comments from other on this? /me hoping your memory is faulty :)
It's utterly DFSG-busting, contaminating other software. However, if no patents are being granted, it's also utterly irrelevant, so need not stop software getting into debian. This is an example of why to examine *software* not just licences. Regards, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
