On Friday 29 February 2008 12:39:58 am Ben Finney wrote: > Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The response implies that -legal is the final arbiter... which gives > > the impression that -legal arbitrates (which it doesn't), that it is > > final (which it isn't), and best of all, that it is always right > > (debatable?). > > I can only say in response that I get *none* of those impressions when > I read the same text. Even with your explication above in mind, I > can't see those impressions on a second reading of the same text. I > really don't know where you're getting that from.
I appriciate your attempt to see my perspective. Do you at least see why the answer "no" is, at best, incomplete? -- Sean Kellogg e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
