On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 09:26:20AM +0000, Дмитрий Ледков wrote: > Francesco Poli wrote: > > In other words, you want to maximize compatibility with other copyleft > > licenses and still have a copyleft license... > > I think these two requirements are _very_ hard to satisfy at the same > > time; it could be that they are actually incompatible with each other. > > Maybe something like "copyleft-ed" BSD license. Eg. standard two > clauses, and an additional clause about enforcing source redistribution > of your software even if it is part of a larger project (open-sourced or > not).
I would prefer not to add to license proliferation. In case I have to, I currently favor something based on OSL. The reason being, that I am not skilled enough to formulate additional clauses, whereas removing some is not so hard. > > Same disclaimers as before: IANAL, TINLA, IANADD, TINASOTODP. > > Erhhhmm..... What do these stand for? I can only guess IANADD from > mentors list - does it stand for I am not a Debian Developer? What about > the others? My understanding of Francesco's disclaimers: IANAL: I am not a lawyer TINLA: This is not law advice IANADD: I am not a Debian Developer TINASOTODP: This is not a (something) of the official Debian project I might be wrong, though. Best regards, Mark Weyer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org