Hi Tim, On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 04:53:03PM +0100, Tim Booth wrote: > This would be nice to get into Debian proper. Even though the upstream > is not being updated the use of ChimeraSlayer seems to be important in > many analysis protocols aside from being wanted by QIIME.
BTW, I have found on their web page: Robert Edgar has developed a faster and more accurate chimera detection tool called UCHIME. (http://drive5.com/usearch/manual/uchime_algo.html) What about packaging this? > I think I'd failed to commit an important patch so have done that now, > as well as trying to improve the long descriptions in the control file > (though there's not much to say). Thanks. > A very minor thing - I notice the copyright file declares the packaging > as GPL3+ while the main code is licensed under BSD. I habitually try > not to add extra licenses if I can avoid it, so could we say the > packaging files are simplified-BSD-licensed too? I changed this as suggested besides several other changes which IMHO makes the packaging more smooth. Could you please have a look at the following: You had overriden dh_install which made d/microbiomeutil.install ineffective. I changed this which had the effect that some symlinks in the microbiomeutil package now are not dangling any more but rather point to /usr/bin/ChimeraSlayer. I'm not sure whether this is a wanted effect or whether you want to ditch this script at all - at least it does not show up in your binary package. It would be nice if you could do some general check whether I did spoiled anything. I think I will try to work down the list of lintian warnings a bit - lets see how far my time limit might reach. Any hints are welcome Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130604095743.gc3...@an3as.eu
