Alexander Schmehl dijo [Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 06:24:36PM +0200]: > > I still don't feel that it's DFSG-free, but if there are already > > packages in the archive with similar clauses, ftpmasters will probably > > consider it DFSG-free. It's OK for me, I don't consider it such a > > serious issue as to arguing its inclusion in main, I was just curious > > about whether it was considered free enough or not. > > Talked to Jörg Jaspert about that (you need to do something during work > time, don't you?), and this clause is indeed free (since it's so > ridiculous easy to circumvent^W fullfill). So for the sake of gaming, > bundle it with any kind of script, and be done with it.
But please try to make this world a saner place by talking about this to the upstream author. Even if he notices the license as a goofup and relicenses under a non-free license... It's better for him to abandon a license with such stupid claims. Greetings, -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]