On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 11:09:41PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > I think that would be wrong, to imply that a bunch of people > had signed on to the draft document without asking them
I think a lot of the heatedness in this discussion is a reaction to implications rather than a reaction to concretely expressed ideas. I'm not sure how best to address that. > Raul> I think, however, that much of the disagreeing is a result of Branden's > Raul> politicing. > > That is an insult. I am rarely swayed by Brandon's posturing, > grand and picturesque though it often is. I can take umbrage > by my own self as well. I apologize for the insult I've delivered to you and Branden -- I apologize both for any concretely expressed insult and all implied insults. > I suggest you actually read up on the issue before joining the > discussion? I'll hold comment until you have caught up and are in a > better position to know what you are talkijng about. I'll leave this to the rest of you. I really need to get around to that revised draft of the voting amendment. Maybe once I've completed that I'll sit back and try to digest this discussion further. Thanks, -- Raul