JC Helary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > No because, as you'll see in my edits to cobako's proposal, the aim =20 > is to have people think in terms of "membership" and not in terms of =20 > "developership". Which will obviously make it easier for long term =20 > non-maintainer contributors to understand that they are also welcome. =20=
I think that'd be a step backwards. Those who get to vote should be contributing to the development (=being developers) of debian in some way. "Members" only for voting strike me as deadwood. If we need to make becoming a developer clearer, then let's do that, rather than introduce a new class of non-developer member. I remain of the opinion that developer=maintainer is a bug and developer=member is a feature. All members should help to develop, in some way, but not necessarily to package or program. Hope that helps, -- MJR/slef Laux nur mia opinio: vidu http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Bv sekvu http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
