On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Chris Lamb dijo [Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 07:12:26PM +0100]: > > I also am reluctant to speak for Ian (!) but I believe he is making > > the point that it is this very diversity of contact points that > > could be part of the problem. > > But that's my point: Do you want to solve that by adding... Yet > another contact point?
Would it be OK if leader@ stayed the contact point, but leader@ had a pool of individuals who were willing to mediate in such a case? [Perhaps with secretary@ or the CTTE chair as the backup in case leader@ was involved?] Such individuals would have the ability and knowledge to involve the existing levers of power (TC, DAM, leader@, anti-harassment etc.) if escalation was required. -- Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com [A] theory is falsifiable [(and therefore scientific) only] if the class of its potential falsifiers is not empty. -- Sir Karl Popper _The Logic of Scientific Discovery_ §21