On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:07:53AM +0100, Michael Neuffer wrote: >Am 20. November 2022 23:04:05 MEZ schrieb Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org>: >>On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 10:45:15PM +0100, Michael Neuffer wrote: >>> On 11/20/22 22:14, Roberto A. Foglietta wrote: >>> > On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 at 21:42, G. Branden Robinson >>> > <g.branden.robin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > > Thank you for, perhaps inadvertently, compelling me to review some of >>> > > the content of the package. I can now say that I am certain there is >>> > > material of worth in the fortunes-off package and support its retention >>> > > in the Debian distribution. A review process for individual entries >>> > > that are incompatible with the project's values is manifest in the BTS. >>> > > >>> > rational approach vs cancel culture: 1 vs 0 >>> > <3 >>> >>> I can only very much agree to this. >> >>I also wholly agree, alas it seems we already lost before this even >>started :( >> >>https://tracker.debian.org/news/1385116/accepted-fortune-mod-11991-72-source-amd64-all-into-unstable/ >> > >As it was an NMU, this should be easily rectified. >Don't let cancel culture win.
Are you volunteering to pick up the package and review its contents, removing the worst stuff that is clearly *not* fit for us to publish? In its previous state it included: * content that is downright illegal in many jurisdictions * content that is impossible to justify against Debian's stated values so simply undoing the NMU here is clearly not an acceptable route forward. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com < Aardvark> I dislike C++ to start with. C++11 just seems to be handing rope-creating factories for users to hang multiple instances of themselves.