On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 04:05:48PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 02:21:24PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > #237071 is _not_ required for security suports. Furthermore, there is > > some difference between "keeping track" and "fixing everything". > > It's not required for security support. > > But it was announced that the toolchain should be in order starting > today. That's not true if sarge lacks fixes that are already in > unstable.
The announcement referred to the compiler toolchain. As of today, we have current versions of gcc-3.3 and gcc-3.4 in testing, which was the goal. grep depending on a library in /usr is totally irrelevant to that goal. > My understanding is: > If you announe "next release is targetted at 19 September 2004" you have > to ensure that all work required to achieve this goal is done. I think you're not helping and are simply sniping. Please take it elsewhere. Thank you. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]