Roberto C Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 05:51:10PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> I can remove a package without any bug - the RC bug is required so that >> the package doesn't return on its own. That is why pre-freeze an RC bug >> is required - and we require the bug on ftp.debian.org for >> documentation reasons. If it makes you feel better, you can still >> submit an RC bug - it won't do anything bad. > OK. I did not understand that. I won't bother with another bug then. > Please remove the cyrus-sasl2-mit packages (libsasl2-gssapi-mit and > libsasl2-krb4-mit) from Etch. > I will file a removal bug soon. Wait, woah. You shouldn't just remove libsasl2-gssapi-mit from etch without a transition package so that people who are upgrading from sarge still have the MIT GSSAPI SASL module installed. That would break a bunch of our servers. I agree with the removal since the base SASL libraries are now newer and the old modules may well not work, but we should provide a better upgrade path than just having the package disappear. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]