On December 12, 2006 at 5:15PM +0100, he (at ftwca.de) wrote: > >>> Could you please allow wl-beta_2.15.4+0.20061015-2 with the 2 line > >>> patch to fix an IMAP connection bug for testing-proposed-updates > >>> to replace wl-beta_2.15.4+0.20061015-1? > >> Could you describe the bug and show the diff (for example by filing a > >> bug with a patch)? > > Submitted to BTS. See Bug#402629. > > OK, looks fine. Please do an upload to testing (a version number like > 0.20061015-2 seems to be OK for that) fixing this (and only this) bug.
I've uploaded wl-beta_2.15.4+0.20061015-2 to testing-proposed-updates
with the following patch. Please push it to etch.
----
--- wl-beta-2.15.4+0.20061015-1/debian/changelog
+++ wl-beta-2.15.4+0.20061015/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+wl-beta (2.15.4+0.20061015-2) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=medium
+
+ * elmo/elmo-imap4.el: Fix "IMAP error: No `OK' response from server",
+ patch from upstream CVS version. (closes: #402629)
+
+ -- Tatsuya Kinoshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:47:41 +0900
+
wl-beta (2.15.4+0.20061015-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release. (CVS trunk on 2006-10-15)
--- wl-beta-2.15.4+0.20061015-1/elmo/elmo-imap4.el
+++ wl-beta-2.15.4+0.20061015/elmo/elmo-imap4.el
@@ -981,8 +981,8 @@
;; Skip garbage output from process before greeting.
(while (and (memq (process-status process) '(open run))
(goto-char (point-max))
- (forward-line -1)
- (not (elmo-imap4-parse-greeting)))
+ (or (/= (forward-line -1) 0)
+ (not (elmo-imap4-parse-greeting))))
(accept-process-output process 1))
(erase-buffer)
(set-process-filter process 'elmo-imap4-arrival-filter)
----
Thanks,
--
Tatsuya Kinoshita
pgpbhx1eBS8JX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
